Office of Computing Services
EFA Coding for Homebound Students
DRAFT
Introduction
Last
spring, the state audited the district’s EFA coding for homebound students
during the 2003-2004 school year. Following that audit, the district had to
return a significant amount of money to the state because of incorrectly coded
student during that school year.
We are sure
that the same types of errors exist in the 2004-2005 SASIxp
data, although we have not been audited for that year. Additionally, we are sure that similar errors
are being made this year – and we want to correct any errors that have already
been made and prevent additional errors from being made in this school year.
Glennis
Cannon, Lou Ann Corley, and I met to discuss the issues with EFA coding for
homebound students. We believe there is
some confusion about the state’s legal definition of “homebound” for EFA
purposes. That confusion is possible
related to “homebased” students served by special
services. The two are NOT related.
There may
also be some confusion with an absence code called “homebound” – which has
nothing to do with EFA codes or special services.
The purpose
of this document is to define carefully and precisely how each is used and to provide
direction about correcting existing errors in the current SASIxp
databases.
EFA Code for Homebound (HO)
A student
must be given an EFA code of HO if that student shows a doctor’s form stating
that he or she cannot attend school because of an illness or an injury – and
instructional services will be provided while the student is at home.
Note
1: The EFA code of HO can be used ONLY
FOR MEDICAL HOMEBOUND STATUS NOT RELATED TO SPECIAL EDUCATION
STATUS.
Note
2: The EFA code of HO CANNOT BE USED FOR STUDENTS WHO ARE HOMEBASED BECAUSE OF THEIR SPECIAL
EDUCATION STATUS.
Note
3: The EFA code of HO CANNOT BE USED FOR STUDENTS WHO ARE
GIVEN ADMINISTRATIVE HOME ASSIGNMENTS
– even if those home assignments are related to the students’ special education
status.
Note
4: The EFA code of HO CANNOT BE ASSIGNED TO A STUDENT UNTIL A
TEACHER IS ASSIGNED to serve that student.
Note
5: Children who are living in shelters for the homeless or for other family services
CAN be assigned an EFA code of HO only if you receive documentation or official
notification from the District’s Office of School Parental Involvement.
Note 6: Official EFA “homebound” status is determined
by the District’s Office of School Parental Involvement – and that is
determined solely by the appropriate doctor’s statement or the appropriate
shelter statement.
IEP Status for Homebased
A student
is “homebased” if and only if the student has an IEP
and that IEP states specifically that the student should be served at home (or
away from the school environment) – and instructional services will be provided
while the student is at home.
Note 7: “Homebased” CANNOT be given an EFA code of HO.
Note 8: The EFA code for a “homebased”
student must be the EFA code for the
disability for which the student is being “homebased.”
Note 9: Only the District’s Office of Special
Services can determine “homebased” status and that is
determined solely by the student’s IEP.
Note
10: A student who is given an
administrative home assignment CANNOT
be given an EFA code of HO.
Absence Code of Homebound
In SASIxp, there is an absence code of HOM, which is named
“homebound.” That code and name are
determined by the state as part of the state template and we are not able to
change that. The absence code of HOM is
NOT related to the EFA code (HO) for homebound and it is NOT related to the IEP
status of homebased.
The state
has not given clear instructions on the use of the HOM absence code; however,
several districts in the state use it to mark a student’s attendance so the
district knows the student is “present” but at home. This can be important in the event of an
emergency situation where someone is trying to account for all students who
should have been present but cannot be accounted for. The HOM code for each day will be a clear
indicator that the student is not at school and does not have to be accounted
for in an emergency situation.
I recommend
strongly that we begin using the HOM attendance code EACH DAY for each student
who is either “homebound,” “homebased,” or on
administrative home assignment. This
attendance code would be entered administratively at each school for each day
for each such student.
Note 11: The absence code HOM is NOT related to EFA
coding or IEP status.
Note 12: The absence code HOM is NOT related to
administrative home assignments for students.
Note 13: The absence code HOM should be used IN
ATTENDANCE to designate the daily status of homebound, homebased,
and home-assigned students.
Conclusion
I recommend
that “homebound” determinations be made by a centralized authority instead of
at each school (see Note 6, above). This
will standardize the recordkeeping and improve quality control over the data.
These
student designations – homebound, homebased, home
assigned – should be discussed by Senior Staff to determine the implications
and ramifications for each of their offices.
The coding has funding, staffing, administrative, and instructional
implications.
In the mean
time, schools should be instructed to review all EFA coding to correct errors
related to the issues raised in this document.
Staff development for SASIxp operators and
decision-makers who provide information to the SASIxp
operators should be planned and delivered as soon as possible.